Figures
Text Descriptions
Figure 1 Trends in general internet use by age
Figure 1 Trends in general internet use by age shows the growth since 2004–05 in the percentage of people who use the internet across different age groups.
- Of people between 18 and 24, 89% said they used the internet in 2004–05, 90% in 2006, 93% in 2007 and 94% in 2008.
- Of people between 25 and 34, 88% said they used the internet in 2004–05, 91% in 2006, 90% in 2007 and 93% in 2008.
- Of people between 35 and 44, 85% said they used the internet in 2004–05, 86% in 2006, 89% in 2007 and 90% in 2008.
- Of people between 45 and 54, 76% said they used the internet in 2004–05, 82% in 2006, 85% in 2007 and 81% in 2008.
- Of people between 55 and 64, 56% said they used the internet in 2004–05, 68% in 2006, 72% in 2007 and 74% in 2008.
- Of people over 65, 28% said they used the internet in 2004–05, 38% in 2006, 41% in 2007 and 44% in 2008.
Figure 2 General internet use and broadband connection
Figure 2 General internet use and broadband connection compares the growth in the use of the internet and broadband connections since 2004–05.
- In 2004–05, 71% of Australians said they used the internet, 77% in 2006, 78% in 2007 and 79% in 2008.
- In 2006, 57% of Australians said they had a broadband connection, 61% in 2007 and 68% in 2008.
Figure 3 General internet use and broadband connection
Figure 3 General internet use and broadband connection shows the break-up of people’s use of the internet and whether they have a broadband connection.
-
Sixty-six per cent of Australians said they have a broadband connection and use the internet; 3% of Australians said they have a broadband connection, but do not use the internet.
-
Thirteen per cent of Australians said they do not have a broadband connection and use the internet; 19% of Australians who said they do not have a broadband connection do not use the internet.
Figure 4 Broadband connection and internet use by location
Figure 4 Broadband connection and internet use by location shows broadband connection and use of the internet by location.
- Of people living in metropolitan areas, 71% have a broadband connection and 80% use the internet.
- Of people living in regional areas, 60% have a broadband connection and 74% use the internet.
- Of people living in rural/remote areas, 62% have a broadband connection and 79% use the internet.
Figure 5 Broadband connection by household type
Figure 5 Broadband connection by household type shows the percentage of people with broadband connection according to the composition of their household.
- Households with children are more likely to have a broadband connection. Eighty four per cent of couples with one or more dependent children at home, 75% of extended families and 68% of single parents with one or more dependent children at home have a broadband connection.
- Seventy four per cent of households of more than one single adult sharing a residence, 64% of couples with no dependent children at home and 46% of single adults have a broadband connection.
Figure 6 Most common reasons for not having a broadband connection
Figure 6 Most common reasons for not having a broadband connection shows the most frequently reported reasons for not having a broadband connection. In addition to the reasons discussed in the report, 5% said that they were able to access broadband elsewhere.
Figure 7 Use of newer communication technologies
Figure 7 Use of newer communication technologies shows the percentage of people who use specific newer technologies at least monthly in 2007 and 2008. Email, text messaging and reading news feeds (RSS) are the most commonly reported activities.
- Email was used at least monthly by 75% of people in both 2007 and 2008.
- Text messaging using mobile was used at least monthly by 57% of people in 2007 and by 61% in 2008.
- News feeds (RSS) were read at least monthly by 39% of people in both 2007 and 2008.
- Instant messaging was used at least monthly by 27% of people in 2007 and by 29% in 2008.
- Social networking sites were used at least monthly by 26% of people in 2008.
- Blogs were read at least monthly by 19% of people in 2007 and by 22% in 2008.
- Postings to an online community or forum were made at least monthly by 16% of people in both 2007 and 2008.
- Wikis were used at least monthly by 16% of people in 2008.
- Podcasts were listened to at least monthly by 15% of people in 2007 and by 16% in 2008.
- Phone calls over the internet were made at least monthly by 14% of people in both 2007 and 2008.
- The web via a mobile phone was used at least monthly by 9% of people in 2007 and by 11% in 2008.
- Blogs were maintained at least monthly by 6% of people in 2007 and by 7% in 2008.
Figure 8 Use of newer communication technologies—by age
Figure 8 Use of newer communication technologies—by age shows that younger people are more likely to use a newer communication technology at least monthly.
- Of people between 18 and 24, 97% said they used a newer communication technology at least monthly.
- Of people between 25 and 34, 96% said they used a newer communication technology at least monthly.
- Of people between 35 and 44, 94% said they used a newer communication technology at least monthly.
- Of people between 45 and 54, 90% said they used a newer communication technology at least monthly.
- Of people between 55 and 64, 83% said they used a newer communication technology at least monthly.
- Of people over 65, 49% said they used a newer communication technology at least monthly.
Figure 9 Use of newer communication technologies—average age of users and non-users
Figure 9 Use of newer communication technologies—average age of users and non-users shows the relative gap between the average age of those who use each newer communication technology at least monthly and those who do not.
- Those who used social networking sites have an average age of 32, compared with an average age of 51 for non-users.
- Those who used a mobile phone to access the web have an average age of 34, compared with 47 for non-users.
- Those who maintained their own blog have an average age of 35 compared with 47 for non-users.
- Those who used instant messaging have an average age of 36 compared with 50 for non-users.
- Those who used wikis have an average age of 36 compared with 48 for non-users.
Those who posted to an online forum have an average age of 37 compared with 48 for non-users. - Those who read blogs have an average age of 37, compared with 48 for non-users.
- Those who listened to podcasts have an average age of 37 compared with 48 for non-users.
- Those who read news feeds (RSS) have an average age of 39, compared with 50 for non-users.
- Those who made phone calls over the internet have an average age of 40 compared with 47 for non-users.
- Those who used text messaging have an average age of 40 compared with 55 for non-users.
- Those who used email have an average age of 42 compared with 57 for non-users.
- Those who do at least one of these activities at least monthly have an average age of 43 compared with an average age of 64 for those who do not do at least one of these activities at least monthly.
Figure 10 Use of newer communication technologies—by location
Figure 10 Use of newer communication technologies—by location shows differences in the use of newer communication technologies by people living in metropolitan, regional and rural or remote locations. People living in rural/remote and metropolitan regions have a consistently higher take-up rate than regional residents. Email and text messaging are by far the most commonly used newer technologies, followed by RSS.
- Email is widely used at least monthly: by 77% of people in metropolitan locations, by 72% of people in rural/remote locations and by 69% of people in regional locations. Text messaging using a mobile phone is also used at least monthly by 63% of people in metropolitan locations, 64% in rural/remote locations and 56% of people in regional locations.
- Other newer communication technologies used at least monthly by people in different locations are in order of popularity:
- Reading news feeds (RSS) – 42% metropolitan; 42% rural/remote; 29% regional.
- Instant messaging – 31% metropolitan; 24% rural/remote; 24% regional.
- Use social networking site – 28% metropolitan; 25% rural/remote; 21% regional.
- Read blogs – 24% metropolitan; 20% rural/remote; 16% regional.
- Post to an online community forum – 18% metropolitan; 11% rural/remote; 12% regional.
- Listen to podcasts – 18% metropolitan; 14% rural/remote; 10% regional.
- Use wikis – 17% metropolitan; 6% rural/remote; 12% regional.
- Make phone calls over the internet – 16% metropolitan; 13% rural/remote; 9% regional.
- Maintain own blog – 8% metropolitan; 6% rural/remote; 6% regional.
- Fourteen per cent of people in metropolitan; 12% in rural/remote and 19% in regional locations did none of these activities at least monthly.
Figure 11 Use of newer communication technologies—frequency of contact with government by internet
Figure 11 Use of newer communication technologies—frequency of contact with government by internet shows differences in the use of newer communication technologies by people who do not use the internet; people who are internet users but have not used the internet to contact government in the last twelve months; and people who are internet users and have used the internet to contact government in the last twelve months. It shows that internet users are more likely to use newer communication technologies than non-internet users. Internet users who have used the internet to contact government are most likely to use newer communication technologies at least monthly.
- Email is used by 11% of non-internet users, by 84% of internet users who have not contacted government and by 95% of internet users who have used the internet to contact government.
- Text messaging using mobile is used by 29% of non-internet users, by 61% of internet users who have not contacted government and by 73% of internet users who have used the internet to contact government.
- News feeds (RSS) are read by 5% of non-internet users, by 30% of internet users who have not contacted government and by 53% of internet users who have used the internet to contact government.
- Instant messaging is used by 5% of non-internet users, by 26% of internet users who have not contacted government and by 39% of internet users who have used the internet to contact government.
- Social networking sites are used by 1% of non-internet users, by 21% of internet users who have not contacted government and by 36% of internet users who have used the internet to contact government.
- Blogs are read by 2% of non-internet users, by 19% of internet users who have not contacted government and by 30% of internet users who have used the internet to contact government.
- Postings to an online community or forum are made by 1% of non-internet users, by 12% of internet users who have not contacted government and by 23% of internet users who have used the internet to contact government.
- Wikis are used by 0% of non-internet users, by 10% of internet users who have not contacted government and by 23% of internet users who have used the internet to contact government.
- Podcasts are listened to by 3% of non-internet users, by 8% of internet users who have not contacted government and by 22% of internet users who have used the internet to contact government.
- Phone calls over the internet are made by 1% of non-internet users, by 8% of internet users who have not contacted government and by 21% of internet users who have used the internet to contact government.
- The web via a mobile phone is used by 2% of non-internet users, by 7% of internet users who have not contacted government and by 15% of internet users who have used the internet to contact government.
- Blogs are maintained by 1% of non-internet users, by 7% of internet users who have not contacted government and by 10% of internet users who have used the internet to contact government.
- Of those who reported using none of the above newer communication technologies at least monthly, 64% were non-internet users, 7% were internet users who have not contacted government and 1% were internet users who have used the internet to contact government.
Figure 12 Changes in method of contacting government—by year
Figure 12 Changes in method of contacting government—by year shows the break-up of the main methods for people’s most recent contact with government in each year since 2004–05.
- In 2004–05, 19% of most recent contact was by internet, 28% was by telephone, 46% was in-person and 13% was by mail.
- In 2006, 25% of most recent contact was by internet, 28% was by telephone, 43% was in-person and 10% was by mail.
- In 2007, 29% of most recent contact was by internet, 32% was by telephone, 37% was in-person and 10% was by mail.
- In 2008, 38% of most recent contact was by internet, 30% was by telephone, 34% was in-person and 9% was by mail.
Figure 13 Changes in method of contacting government—by service delivery channel
Figure 13 Changes in method of contacting government—by service delivery channel shows the growth of use of the internet for people’s most recent contact with government compared to other methods. It shows that this growth is mainly at the expense of contact in-person.
- The internet was used by 19% of people for their most recent contact in 2004–05, 25% in 2006, 29% in 2007 and 38% in 2008.
- The telephone was used by 28% of people for their most recent contact in 2004–05 and 2006, 32% in 2007 and 30% in 2008.
- Contact in person was used by 46% of people for their most recent contact in 2004–05, 43% in 2006, 37% in 2007 and 34% in 2008.
- Mail was used by 13% of people for their most recent contact in 2004–05, 10% in 2006 and 2007 and 9% in 2008.
Figure 14 Method of contacting government—males by age
Figure 14 Method of contacting government—males by age shows the methods used by males to contact government in different age groups.
- Of males between 18 and 24, 39% of their most recent contact was by internet, 19% was by telephone, 43% was in-person and 8% was by mail.
- Of males between 25 and 34, 47% of their most recent contact was by internet, 25% was by telephone, 32% was in-person and 10% was by mail.
- Of males between 35 and 44, 47% of their most recent contact was by internet, 31% was by telephone, 24% was in-person and 8% was by mail.
- Of males between 45 and 54, 49% of their most recent contact was by internet, 30% was by telephone, 24% was in-person and 6% was by mail.
- Of males between 55 and 64, 35% of their most recent contact was by internet, 25% was by telephone, 38% was in-person and 9% was by mail.
- Of males over 65, 18% of their most recent contact was by internet, 29% was by telephone, 47% was in-person and 16% was by mail.
Figure 15 Method of contacting government—females by age
Figure 15 Method of contacting government—females by age shows the methods used by females to contact government in different age groups.
- Of females between 18 and 24, 41% of their most recent contact was by internet, 26% was by telephone, 33% was in-person and 9% was by mail.
- Of females between 25 and 34, 47% of their most recent contact was by internet, 31% was by telephone, 26% was in-person and 9% was by mail.
- Of females between 35 and 44, 47% of their most recent contact was by internet, 35% was by telephone, 27% was in-person and 6% was by mail.
- Of females between 45 and 54, 36% of their most recent contact was by internet, 37% was by telephone, 29% was in-person and 7% was by mail.
- Of females between 55 and 64, 37% of their most recent contact was by internet, 31% was by telephone, 35% was in-person and 6% was by mail.
- Of females over 65, 10% of their most recent contact was by internet, 36% was by telephone, 48% was in-person and 11% was by mail.
Figure 16 Type of transaction involved in most recent contact with government
Figure 16 Type of transaction involved in most recent contact with government shows that 37% of people only sought or obtained information in their most recent contact with government but did not provide information; 20% provided information but there was no exchange of information; and 41% exchanged information. Two per cent were unable or refused to say what sort of transaction was involved.
Figure 17 Most common services used in most recent contact with government
Figure 17 Most common services used in most recent contact with government shows the type of services accessed during people’s most recent contact with government since 2004–05. ‘Community and social services’ remains the most commonly accessed category of government service. ‘Transport’ and ‘business services, economics, finance and taxation’ remain the next most common categories of services used.
- ‘Community and social services’ were the most recently used services for 20% of people in 2004–05, 22% in 2006, 25% in 2007 and 30% in 2008.
- ‘Transport’ was the most recently used service for 18% of people in 2004–05, 19% in 2006, 13% in 2007 and 14% in 2008.
- ‘Business services, economics, finance and taxation’ were the most recently used services for 11% of people in 2004–05, 14% in 2006, 11% in 2007 and 10% in 2008.
- ‘Land, property, planning and construction’ were the most recently used services for 15% of people in 2004–05, 14% in 2006, 10% in 2007 and 9% in 2008.
- ‘Health and health services’ were the most recently used services for 7% of people in 2004 05 and 2006, and 9% in 2007 and 2008.
- ‘Primary industry, natural resources and energy’ were the most recently used services for 4% of people in 2004–05, 6% in 2006, 5% in 2007 and 7% in 2008.
- ‘Employment’ was the most recently used service for 5% of people in 2004–05, 4% in 2006, and 6% in 2007 and 2008.
Figure 18 Use of the internet to contact government in the previous 12 months
Figure 18 Use of the internet to contact government in the previous 12 months shows the changes in how frequently people used the internet in the last twelve months to contact government in each year since 2004–05.
- In 2004–05, 4% of those who used the internet to contact government did so just once; 11% used it a few times; 9% used it for some; 11% for most and 3% for all of their contact with government.
- In 2006, 5% of those who used the internet to contact government did so just once; 13% used it a few times; 11% used it for some; 16% for most and 3% for all of their contact with government.
- In 2007, 5% of those who used the internet to contact government did so just once; 14% used it a few times; 15% used it for some; 20% for most and 5% for all of their contact with government.
- In 2008, 5% of those who used the internet to contact government did so just once; 12% used it a few times; 15% used it for some; 25% for most and 6% for all of their contact with government.
- The proportion of people who did not use the internet at all in the last twelve months to contact government fell from 60% in 2004–05 to 52% in 2006, 41% in 2007 and 37% in 2008.
Figure 19 Contacting government by internet—age profile
Figure 19 Contacting government by internet—age profile shows the growth since 2004–05 in the percentage of people who use the internet to contact government across different age groups.
- Of people between 18 and 24, 43% said they used the internet to contact government in 2004–05, 59% in 2006, and 77% in 2007 and 2008.
- Of people between 25 and 34, 53% said they used the internet to contact government in 2004–05, 61% in 2006, 74% in 2007 and 81% in 2008.
- Of people between 35 and 44, 55% said they used the internet to contact government in 2004–05 and in 2006, 70% in 2007 and 75% in 2008.
- Of people between 45 and 54, 43% said they used the internet to contact government in 2004–05, 54% in 2006, 64% in 2007 and 65% in 2008.
- Of people between 55 and 64, 28% said they used the internet to contact government in 2004–05, 40% in 2006, 49% in 2007 and 57% in 2008.
- Of people over 65, 10% said they used the internet to contact government in 2004–05, 15% in 2006, 19% in 2007 and 27% in 2008.
Figure 20 Characteristics of those who used the internet to contact government in the previous 12 months
Figure 20 Characteristics of those who used the internet to contact government in the previous 12 months shows different types of demographic information about those people who have used the internet to contact government in the last twelve months.
- Location – 66% of those who live in metropolitan areas; 54% of those in regional areas; and 62% of those in rural/remote areas used the internet to make contact with government in the last twelve months.
- Personal income – Use of the internet to contact government tends to increase with income. 49% of those who earned $15,000 or less per year used the internet to make contact with government in the last twelve months; 51% of those who earned between $15,001 and $30,000; and 65% of those who earned between $30,001 and $50,000.
- Seventy six per cent of those who earned between $50,001 and $70,000; 82% of those who earned between $70,001 and $90,000; 79% of those who earned between $90,001 and $100,000; 85% of those who earned between $100,001 and $130,000; and 87% of those who earned more than $130,000 used the internet to make contact with government in the last twelve months.
- Nature of work – Those employed in office-based occupations are more likely to have used the internet to make contact with government in the last twelve months (78%) than those in non-office based occupations (65%). Fifty nine per cent of those who were unemployed used the internet to make contact with government in the last twelve months.
- Employment – 73% of people in the workforce made contact with government in the last twelve months by internet. Fifty nine per cent of people not in the workforce and 30% of those who are retired also used the internet to make contact with government in the last twelve months.
- Education – Use of the internet to contact government tends to increase with education. Seventy six per cent of those with post secondary education used the internet to make contact with government in the last twelve months. Fifty nine per cent of those who finished high school but had no further education and 35% of those who did not finish high school used the internet to make contact with government in the last twelve months.
- Household type – 72% of households with dependent children used the internet to make contact with government in the last twelve months. Sixty per cent of couples with no dependent children or extended families and 53% of single adults used the internet to make contact with government in the last twelve months.
- Age – 77% of those aged 18-24; 81% of those aged 25-34; 75% of those aged 35-44; 65% of those aged 45-54; 57% of those aged 55-64 and 27% of those aged over 65 used the internet to make contact with government in the last twelve months.
- Gender – 66% of males and 60% of females used the internet to make contact with government in the last twelve months.
Figure 21 Level of government accessed by internet
Figure 21 Level of government accessed by internet shows which level of government was accessed by people whose last contact with government was by internet in each year since 2004–05.
- The Australian Government was contacted by 21% of people who used the internet for their most recent contact with government in 2004–05, by 28% in 2006, by 27% in 2007 and by 34% in 2008.
- State and territory governments were contacted by 19% of people who used the internet for their most recent contact with government in 2004–05, by 24% in 2006; by 26% in 2007 and by 39% in 2008.
- Local government was contacted by 14% of people who used the internet for their most recent contact with government in 2004–05, by 19% in 2006; by 24% in 2007 and by 34% in 2008.
Figure 22 Contacting government by internet—type of transaction
Figure 22 Contacting government by internet—type of transaction shows that 50% of people whose most recent contact with government was by internet only sought or obtained information but did not provide information; 19% provided information but there was no exchange of information; and 30% exchanged information. One per cent were unable or refused to say what sort of transaction was involved.
Figure 23 Government services accessed by internet
Figure 23 Government services accessed by internet shows the type of services most commonly accessed by people whose most recent contact with government was by internet compared with all contacts. ‘Community and social services’ remains the most commonly accessed category of government service. ‘Transport’ and ‘business services, economics, finance and taxation’ remain the next most common categories of services used.
- ‘Community and social services’ were the most recently used services for 22% of people whose contact was by internet compared with 30% of all contacts.
‘Transport’ was the most recently used service for 16% of people whose contact was by internet compared with 14% of all contacts. - ‘Business services, economics, finance and taxation’ were the most recently used services for 15% of people whose contact was by internet compared with 10% of all contacts.
- ‘Land, property, planning and construction’ were the most recently used services for 8% of people whose contact was by internet compared with 9% of all contacts.
- ‘Health and health services’ were the most recently used services for 3% of people whose contact was by internet compared with 9% of all contacts.
‘Primary industry, natural resources and energy’ were the most recently used services for 6% of people whose contact was by internet compared with 7% of all contacts. - ‘Employment’ was the most recently used service for 8% of people whose contact was by internet compared with 6% of all contacts.
- ‘International, travel and immigration’ were the most recently used services for 6% of people whose contact was by internet compared with 3% of all contacts.
- ‘Education and training’ were the most recently used services for 4% of people whose contact was by internet compared with 3% of all contacts.
- ‘Political system, election and representatives’ were the most recently used services for 1% of people whose contact was by internet compared with 1% of all contacts.
- ‘Environment, climate and conservation’ were the most recently used services for 2% of people whose contact was by internet compared with 1% of all contacts.
- ‘Law, justice and consumer protection’ were the most recently used service for 1% of people whose contact was by internet compared with 1% of all contacts.
- ‘Emergency services, defence and national security’ were the most recently used services for 1% of people whose contact was by internet compared with 1% of all contacts.
Figure 24 How the most recent government website visited was found
Figure 24 How the most recent government website visited was found shows that 26% of those whose most recent contact with government was by internet said that they had already known about the website because they had used it before; 26% found out about the website by searching for it; 17% obtained the information from a printed source; 13% obtained it from a government department or employee; 4% found it through a link on another website; 2% heard about it through work or their employer; 2% saw it in a newspaper advertisement; 2% saw it in a TV advertisement and 1% said they had heard about it at school or university.
Figure 25 How the most recent government website visited was rated
Figure 25 How the most recent government website visited was rated shows how people whose most recent contact with government was by internet rated the website that they visited.
- When asked how they rated the website as ‘designed for all kinds of people’, 37% said that it was excellent; 32% that it was good; 14% were neutral; 9% said that it was poor and 3% said that it was very poor. Five per cent were unable to say how they rated the website.
- When asked how they rated the website as ‘designed to help you get things done quickly’, 55% said that it was excellent; 24% that it was good; 9% were neutral; 6% said that it was poor and 4% said that it was very poor. Two per cent were unable to say how they rated the website.
- When asked how they rated the website as ‘designed to help you find out information’, 57% said that it was excellent; 25% that it was good; 7% were neutral; 7% said that it was poor and 2% said that it was very poor. Two per cent were unable to say how they rated the website.
- When asked how they rated the website as ‘easy to use and clearly written’, 57% said that it was excellent; 28% that it was good; 7% were neutral; 5% said that it was poor and 2% said that it was very poor. One per cent were unable to say how they rated the website.
- When asked how they rated the website as ‘up to date’, 72% said that it was excellent; 18% that it was good; 5% were neutral; 2% said that it was poor and 2% said that it was very poor. Two per cent were unable to say how they rated the website.
Figure 26 Positive perceptions of government websites by proportion of contact by internet
Figure 26 Positive perceptions of government websites by proportion of contact by internet shows the break-up of people’s positive perceptions of government websites according to how much of their contact with government in the last twelve months was by internet.
- Of those who had used the internet to contact government just once or a few times in the last twelve months, 64% had positive perceptions about whether the most recently visited website was designed for all kinds of people; 74% that it was designed to help you get things done quickly and designed to help you find out information; 76% that it was easy to use and clearly written and 84% that it was up to date.
- Of those who had used the internet for some of their contact with government in the last twelve months, 66% had positive perceptions about whether most recently visited website was designed for all kinds of people; 74% that it was designed to help you get things done quickly; 79% that it was designed to help you find out information; 85% that it was easy to use and clearly written and 87% that it was up to date.
- Of those who had used the internet for most of their contact with government in the last twelve months, 71% had positive perceptions about whether the most recently visited website was designed for all kinds of people; 80% that it was designed to help you get things done quickly; 85% that it was designed to help you find out information; 86% that it was easy to use and clearly written and 91% that it was up to date.
- Of those who had used the internet for all of their contact with government in the last twelve months, 77% had positive perceptions about whether the most recently visited website was designed for all kinds of people; 84% that it was designed to help you get things done quickly; 86% that it was designed to help you find out information; 90% that it was easy to use and clearly written and 92% that it was up to date.
Figure 27 Negative perceptions of government websites by proportion of contact by internet
Figure 27 Negative perceptions of government websites by proportion of contact by internet shows the break-up of people’s negative perceptions of government websites according to how much of their contact with government in the last twelve months was by internet.
- Of those who had used the internet to contact government just once or a few times in the last twelve months, 17% had negative perceptions about whether the most recently visited website was designed for all kinds of people; 18% that it was designed to help you get things done quickly; 17% that it was designed to help you find out information; 13% that it was easy to use and clearly written and 7% that it was up to date.
- Of those who had used the internet for some of their contact with government in the last twelve months, 9% had negative perceptions about whether the most recently visited website was designed for all kinds of people; 10% that it was designed to help you get things done quickly; 9% that it was designed to help you find out information; 7% that it was easy to use and clearly written and 5% that it was up to date.
- Of those who had used the internet for most of their contact with government in the last twelve months, 13% had negative perceptions about whether the most recently visited website was designed for all kinds of people; 10% that it was designed to help you get things done quickly; 8% that it was designed to help you find out information; 7% that it was easy to use and clearly written and 3% that it was up to date.
- Of those who had used the internet for all of their contact with government in the last twelve months, 5% had negative perceptions about whether the most recently visited website was designed for all kinds of people; 6% that it was designed to help you get things done quickly; 4% that it was designed to help you find out information; 3% that it was easy to use and clearly written and 1% that it was up to date.
Figure 28 How government website and email addresses are found
Figure 28 How government website and email addresses are found shows that 90% of those who contacted government by internet in the last twelve months said they would use a search engine to go about finding a government website or email address; 21% would use a link from another site; 21% would find it on written material from the organisation; 16% from advertising; 14% would have saved it as a ‘favourite’; 14% would use a government entry point; 12% would ring them up and 1% would use the phone book, yellow or white pages.
Figure 29 How government websites visited in previous 12 months were rated
Figure 29 How government websites visited in previous 12 months were rated shows the overall perceptions of government websites of people who had contacted the government by internet in the last twelve months.
- When asked how they rated ‘the extent to which you could trust’ government websites 60% said that it was excellent; 23% that it was good; 9% were neutral; 3% said that it was poor and 2% said that it was very poor. Three per cent were unable to say how they rated the website.
- When asked how they rated ‘the extent to which you could recommend them to someone else’, 49% said that it was excellent; 30% that it was good; 10% were neutral; 4% said that it was poor and 2% said that it was very poor. Four per cent were unable to say how they rated the website.
- When asked how they rated ‘their quality compared to non-government business sites’ 43% said that it was excellent; 33% that it was good; 11% were neutral; 5% said that it was poor and 2% said that it was very poor. Six per cent were unable to say how they rated the website.
Figure 30 Awareness of australia.gov.au
Figure 30 Awareness of australia.gov.au shows that in 2008, 59% of people said that they were aware of Australia.gov.au and 41% said that they were not aware of it. In 2007, 61% of people said that they were aware of Australia.gov.au and 38% said that they were not aware of it. One per cent were unable to say.
Figure 31 Type of telephone contact
Figure 31 Type of telephone contact shows that 51% of people whose most recent contact with government was by telephone used an automated system and then spoke to someone; 34% spoke to someone without going through an automated system and 12% used an automated system and did not speak to anyone. Three per cent were unable to say what sort of transaction was involved.
Figure 32 Level of government accessed by telephone
Figure 32 Level of government accessed by telephone shows which level of government was accessed by people whose last contact with government was by telephone in each year since 2004–05.
- The Australian Government was contacted by 31% of people who used the telephone for their most recent contact with government in 2004–05, by 28% in 2006 and 2007 and by 30% in 2008.
- State and territory governments were contacted by 22% of people who used the telephone for their most recent contact with government in 2004–05, by 21% in 2006; by 26% in 2007 and by 22% in 2008.
- Local government was contacted by 29% of people who used the telephone for their most recent contact with government in 2004–05, by 27% in 2006; by 31% in 2007 and by 30% in 2008.
Figure 33 Contacting government by telephone—type of transaction
Figure 33 Contacting government by telephone—type of transaction shows that 37% of people whose most recent contact with government was by telephone only sought or obtained information but did not provide information; 16% provided information but there was no exchange of information; and 45% exchanged information. Two per cent were unable or refused to say what sort of transaction was involved.
Figure 34 Government services accessed by telephone
Figure 34 Government services accessed by telephone shows the type of services most commonly accessed by people whose most recent contact with government was by telephone compared with all contacts. ‘Community and social services’ remains the most commonly accessed category of government service. ‘Business services, economics, finance and taxation’ and ‘land, property, planning and construction’ were the next most common categories of services used.
- ‘Community and social services’ were the most recently used services for 39% of people whose contact was by telephone compared with 30% of all contacts.
‘Business services, economics, finance and taxation’ were the most recently used services for 11% of people whose contact was by telephone compared with 10% of all contacts. - ‘Land, property, planning and construction’ were the most recently used services for 9% of people whose contact was by telephone compared with 9% of all contacts.
‘Health and health services’ were the most recently used services for 8% of people whose contact was by telephone compared with 9% of all contacts. - ‘Primary industry, natural resources and energy’ were the most recently used services for 8% of people whose contact was by telephone compared with 7% of all contacts.
- ‘Transport’ was the most recently used service for 7% of people whose contact was by telephone compared with 14% of all contacts.
Figure 35 Satisfaction with services received
Figure 35 Satisfaction with services received shows that the majority of people are satisfied with the level of service they receive. Eighty seven per cent of people were satisfied with the outcome of their last contact with government while 10% were dissatisfied; 83% of people were satisfied with waiting for a reply while 14% were dissatisfied; 89% of people were satisfied with the ease of finding specific information and 8% were dissatisfied; and 91% of people were satisfied with the ease of using the service while 8% were dissatisfied. Some respondents were unable to say if they were satisfied or dissatisfied.
Figure 36 Average ratings for achieving what was intended—by channel
Figure 36 Average ratings for achieving what was intended—by channel shows the extent to which people achieved their intended outcome in their most recent contact with government since 2006 depending on the method of contact.
- Those who used the internet to contact government gave an average rating of 8.7 out of ten for achieving their intended outcome in 2006, 8.9 in 2007 and 8.6 in 2008.
- Those who used the telephone to contact government gave an average rating of 8.1 out of ten for achieving their intended outcome in 2006, 8.3 in 2007 and 8.1 in 2008.
- Those who contacted government in person gave an average rating of 8.8 out of ten for achieving their intended outcome in 2006, and 8.7 in 2007 and 2008.
- Those who used mail to contact government gave an average rating of 8.8 out of ten for achieving their intended outcome in 2006, 8.5 in 2007 and 8.1 in 2008.
Figure 37 Average ratings of achieving what was intended—by type of transaction
Figure 37 Average ratings of achieving what was intended—by type of transaction shows the extent to which people achieved their intended outcome in their most recent contact with government since 2006 depending on the reason for contact.
- Those who contacted government and sought or obtained information gave an average rating of 8.0 out of ten for achieving their intended outcome in 2006, and 8.3 in 2007 and 2008.
- Those who contacted government and provided information gave an average rating of 8.3 out of ten for achieving their intended outcome in 2006, 8.6 in 2007 and 8.3 in 2008.
- Those who contacted government and exchanged information gave an average rating of 8.5 out of ten for achieving their intended outcome in 2006, 8.6 in 2007 and 8.7 in 2008.
Figure 38 Average ratings of achieving what was intended—by level of government
Figure 38 Average ratings of achieving what was intended—by level of government shows the extent to which people achieved their intended outcome in their most recent contact with government since 2006 depending on the level of government contacted.
- Those who contacted the Australian Government gave an average rating of 8.5 out of ten for achieving their intended outcome in 2006 and 2007, and 8.4 in 2008.
- Those who contacted state and territory government gave an average rating of 8.8 out of ten for achieving their intended outcome in 2006, and 8.7 in 2007 and 2008.
- Those who contacted local government gave an average rating of 8.6 out of ten for achieving their intended outcome in 2006 and 2007 and 8.4 in 2008.
Figure 39 Satisfaction with outcome—time series by channel
Figure 39 Satisfaction with outcome—time series by channel shows how satisfied people were with the outcome in their most recent contact with government depending on the method of contact since 2004–05.
- Of those who used the internet to contact government 89% were satisfied with the outcome in 2004–05, 93% were satisfied in 2006 and 2007, and 91% were satisfied in 2008.
- Of those who used the telephone to contact government 82% were satisfied with the outcome in 2004–05 and 2006, 87% were satisfied in 2007, and 83% were satisfied in 2008.
- Of those who contacted government in person 89% were satisfied with the outcome in 2006, 90% were satisfied in 2007, and 89% were satisfied in 2008.
- Of those who used mail to contact government 82% were satisfied with the outcome in 2006 and 2007, and 78% were satisfied in 2008.
Figure 40 Satisfaction with outcome—by channel
Figure 40 Satisfaction with outcome—by channel shows the extent to which people were satisfied with achieving their intended outcome in their most recent contact with government depending on the method of contact.
- Of those who used the internet to contact government, 32% were extremely satisfied with the outcome, 40% were very satisfied, 19% were somewhat satisfied, 3% were not very satisfied and 4% were not satisfied at all. Two per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who used the telephone to contact government, 26% were extremely satisfied with the outcome, 37% were very satisfied, 20% were somewhat satisfied, 6% were not very satisfied and 9% were not satisfied at all. Two per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who contacted government in person, 29% were extremely satisfied with the outcome, 39% were very satisfied, 21% were somewhat satisfied, 3% were not very satisfied and 5% were not satisfied at all. Two per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who used mail to contact government, 24% were extremely satisfied with the outcome, 35% were very satisfied, 19% were somewhat satisfied, 2% were not very satisfied and 13% were not satisfied at all. Seven per cent were unable to say.
Figure 41 Satisfaction with outcome—by type of transaction
Figure 41 Satisfaction with outcome—by type of transaction shows the extent to which people were satisfied with the outcome in their most recent contact with government depending on the reason for contact.
- Of those who sought or obtained information, 26% were extremely satisfied with the outcome, 42% were very satisfied, 20% were somewhat satisfied, 5% were not very satisfied and 6% were not satisfied at all. Two per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who provided information, 29% were extremely satisfied with the outcome, 35% were very satisfied, 21% were somewhat satisfied, 4% were not very satisfied and 8% were not satisfied at all. Three per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who exchanged information, 31% were extremely satisfied with the outcome, 38% were very satisfied, 19% were somewhat satisfied, 4% were not very satisfied and 5% were not satisfied at all. Two per cent were unable to say.
Figure 42 Satisfaction with outcome—by level of government
Figure 42 Satisfaction with outcome—by level of government shows the extent to which people were satisfied with the outcome of their most recent contact with government depending on the level of government contacted.
- Of those who contacted the Australian Government, 27% were extremely satisfied with the outcome, 38% were very satisfied, 21% were somewhat satisfied, 4% were not very satisfied and 7% were not satisfied at all. Three per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who contacted state and territory government, 29% were extremely satisfied with the outcome, 42% were very satisfied, 19% were somewhat satisfied, 4% were not very satisfied and 6% were not satisfied at all. Two per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who contacted local government, 31% were extremely satisfied with the outcome, 35% were very satisfied, 20% were somewhat satisfied, 5% were not very satisfied and 7% were not satisfied at all. Two per cent were unable to say.
Figure 43 Satisfaction with length of wait for reply—by channel
Figure 43 Satisfaction with length of wait for reply—by channel shows how satisfied people were with how long they had to wait for a reply to their inquiry in their most recent contact with government depending on the method of contact.
- Of those who used the internet to contact government, 31% were extremely satisfied with the length of wait for a reply, 44% were very satisfied, 13% were somewhat satisfied, 5% were not very satisfied and 3% were not satisfied at all. Four per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who used the telephone to contact government, 20% were extremely satisfied with the length of wait for a reply, 37% were very satisfied, 22% were somewhat satisfied, 11% were not very satisfied and 8% were not satisfied at all. Two per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who contacted government in person, 24% were extremely satisfied with the length of wait for a reply, 37% were very satisfied, 24% were somewhat satisfied, 7% were not very satisfied and 5% were not satisfied at all. Four per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who used mail to contact government, 14% were extremely satisfied with the length of wait for a reply, 36% were very satisfied, 24% were somewhat satisfied, 8% were not very satisfied and 12% were not satisfied at all. Seven per cent were unable to say.
Figure 44 Satisfaction with length of time waiting for reply—by type of transaction
Figure 44 Satisfaction with length of time waiting for reply—by type of transaction shows the extent to which people were satisfied with how long they had to wait for a reply to their inquiry in their most recent contact with government depending on the reason for contact.
- Of those who sought or obtained information, 26% were extremely satisfied with the length of wait for a reply, 40% were very satisfied, 19% were somewhat satisfied, 6% were not very satisfied and 6% were not satisfied at all. Three per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who provided information, 22% were extremely satisfied with the length of wait for a reply, 37% were very satisfied, 23% were somewhat satisfied, 9% were not very satisfied and 7% were not satisfied at all. Three per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who exchanged information, 24% were extremely satisfied with the length of wait for a reply, 39% were very satisfied, 20% were somewhat satisfied, 8% were not very satisfied and 6% were not satisfied at all. Three per cent were unable to say.
Figure 45 Satisfaction with length of time waiting for reply—by level of government
Figure 45 Satisfaction with length of time waiting for reply—by level of government shows the extent to which people were satisfied with how long they had to wait for a reply to their inquiry in their most recent contact with government depending on the level of government contacted.
- Of those who contacted the Australian Government, 22% were extremely satisfied with the length of wait for a reply, 38% were very satisfied, 22% were somewhat satisfied, 8% were not very satisfied and 6% were not satisfied at all. Three per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who contacted state and territory government, 24% were extremely satisfied with the length of wait for a reply, 42% were very satisfied, 18% were somewhat satisfied, 6% were not very satisfied and 6% were not satisfied at all. Four per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who contacted local government, 26% were extremely satisfied with the length of wait for a reply, 37% were very satisfied, 19% were somewhat satisfied, 8% were not very satisfied and 6% were not satisfied at all. Four per cent were unable to say.
Figure 46 Satisfaction with ease of finding specific information—by channel
Figure 46 Satisfaction with ease of finding specific information—by channel shows how satisfied people were with the ease of finding the specific information or service in their most recent contact with government depending on the method of contact.
- Of those who used the internet to contact government, 18% were extremely satisfied with the ease of finding specific information, 49% were very satisfied, 24% were somewhat satisfied, 5% were not very satisfied and 2% were not satisfied at all. One per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who used the telephone to contact government, 20% were extremely satisfied with the ease of finding specific information, 45% were very satisfied, 23% were somewhat satisfied, 6% were not very satisfied and 4% were not satisfied at all. Two per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who contacted government in person, 22% were extremely satisfied with the ease of finding specific information, 45% were very satisfied, 20% were somewhat satisfied, 5% were not very satisfied and 3% were not satisfied at all. Five per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who used mail to contact government, 23% were extremely satisfied with the ease of finding specific information, 41% were very satisfied, 18% were somewhat satisfied, 6% were not very satisfied and 4% were not satisfied at all. Eight per cent were unable to say.
Figure 47 Satisfaction with ease of finding specific information—by type of transaction
Figure 47 Satisfaction with ease of finding specific information—by type of transaction shows how satisfied people were with the ease of finding the specific information or service in their most recent contact with government depending on the reason for contact.
- Of those who sought or obtained information, 19% were extremely satisfied with the ease of finding specific information, 45% were very satisfied, 25% were somewhat satisfied, 5% were not very satisfied and 4% were not satisfied at all. Two per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who provided information, 19% were extremely satisfied with the ease of finding specific information, 47% were very satisfied, 23% were somewhat satisfied, 5% were not very satisfied and 2% were not satisfied at all. Four per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who exchanged information, 22% were extremely satisfied with the ease of finding specific information, 47% were very satisfied, 20% were somewhat satisfied, 6% were not very satisfied and 2% were not satisfied at all. Four per cent were unable to say.
Figure 48 Satisfaction with ease of finding specific information—by level of government
Figure 48 Satisfaction with ease of finding specific information—by level of government shows how satisfied people were with the ease of finding the specific information or service in their most recent contact with government depending on the level of government contacted.
- Of those who contacted the Australian Government, 19% were extremely satisfied with the ease of finding specific information, 45% were very satisfied, 24% were somewhat satisfied, 6% were not very satisfied and 3% were not satisfied at all. Four per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who contacted state and territory government, 21% were extremely satisfied with the ease of finding specific information, 49% were very satisfied, 21% were somewhat satisfied, 5% were not very satisfied and 3% were not satisfied at all. Two per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who contacted local government, 22% were extremely satisfied with the ease of finding specific information, 46% were very satisfied, 22% were somewhat satisfied, 5% were not very satisfied and 2% were not satisfied at all. Three per cent were unable to say.
Figure 49 Satisfaction with ease of using the service—by channel
Figure 49 Satisfaction with ease of using the service—by channel shows how satisfied people were with the ease of using the service in their most recent contact with government depending on the method of contact.
- Of those who used the internet to contact government, 22% were extremely satisfied with the ease of using the service, 50% were very satisfied, 23% were somewhat satisfied, 3% were not very satisfied and 2% were not satisfied at all.
- Of those who used the telephone to contact government, 19% were extremely satisfied with the ease of using the service, 48% were very satisfied, 20% were somewhat satisfied, 7% were not very satisfied and 5% were not satisfied at all. One per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who contacted government in person, 22% were extremely satisfied with the ease of using the service, 49% were very satisfied, 20% were somewhat satisfied, 4% were not very satisfied and 3% were not satisfied at all. Two per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who used mail to contact government, 17% were extremely satisfied with the ease of using the service, 41% were very satisfied, 26% were somewhat satisfied, 8% were not very satisfied and 6% were not satisfied at all. Two per cent were unable to say.
Figure 50 Satisfaction with ease of using the service—by type of transaction
Figure 50 Satisfaction with ease of using the service—by type of transaction shows how satisfied people were with the ease of using the service in their most recent contact with government depending on the reason for contact.
- Of those who sought or obtained information, 20% were extremely satisfied with the ease of using the service, 50% were very satisfied, 21% were somewhat satisfied, 4% were not very satisfied and 4% were not satisfied at all. One per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who provided information, 21% were extremely satisfied with the ease of using the service, 47% were very satisfied, 24% were somewhat satisfied, 6% were not very satisfied and 2% were not satisfied at all. One per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who exchanged information, 22% were extremely satisfied with the ease of using the service, 49% were very satisfied, 21% were somewhat satisfied, 4% were not very satisfied and 3% were not satisfied at all. Two per cent were unable to say.
Figure 51 Satisfaction with ease of using the service—by level of government contacted
Figure 51 Satisfaction with ease of using the service—by level of government contacted shows how satisfied people were with the ease of using the service in their most recent contact with government depending on the level of government contacted.
- Of those who contacted the Australian Government, 22% were extremely satisfied with the ease of using the service, 51% were very satisfied, 19% were somewhat satisfied, 4% were not very satisfied and 3% were not satisfied at all. One per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who contacted state and territory government, 23% were extremely satisfied with the ease of using the service, 49% were very satisfied, 21% were somewhat satisfied, 2% were not very satisfied and 3% were not satisfied at all. Two per cent were unable to say.
- Of those who contacted local government, 18% were extremely satisfied with the ease of using the service, 47% were very satisfied, 23% were somewhat satisfied, 7% were not very satisfied and 4% were not satisfied at all. One per cent were unable to say.
Figure 52 Dissatisfaction by service delivery channel used to contact government 20072008
Figure 53 Most common factors influencing choice of channel
Figure 53 Most common factors influencing choice of channel shows the relative importance of convenience, channel features and availability in influencing people’s choice of contact method used in their most recent contact with government.
- For people who used the internet in their most recent contact with government, convenience was a reason for 80% of people in 2007 and for 83% in 2008. Channel features were reasons for 26% of people in 2007 and for 20% in 2008. Seven per cent said that availability was a reason for choosing to use the internet in their most recent contact with government in 2008.
- For people who used the telephone in their most recent contact with government, convenience was a reason for 50% of people in 2007 and for 44% in 2008. Channel features were reasons for 40% of people in 2007 and for 44% in 2008. Availability was a reason for choosing to use the telephone for 13% of people in 2007 and 12% in 2008.
- For people who made contact in person in their most recent contact with government, convenience was a reason for 29% of people in 2007 and for 39% in 2008. Channel features were reasons for 34% of people in 2007 and for 30% in 2008. Availability was a reason for choosing in-person contact for 35% of people in 2007 and 39% in 2008.
- For people who used mail in their most recent contact with government, convenience was a reason for 25% of people in 2007 and for 27% in 2008. Channel features were reasons for 23% of people in 2007 and 2008. Availability was a reason for choosing to use mail for 44% of people in 2007 and 55% in 2008.
Figure 54 Use of the internet to contact government services
Figure 54 Use of the internet to contact government services shows the growth in the use of the internet to contact government from 19% of most recent contacts with government in 2004–05, to 25% in 2006, 29% in 2007 and 38% in 2008.
Figure 55 Most common reasons for making contact by internet
Figure 55 Most common reasons for making contact by internet shows people’s main reasons for choosing to use the internet in their most recent contact with government sorted by the themes of convenience, channel features and availability. Issues of convenience were the main reasons people chose to use the internet to contact government.
- Of those people who mentioned at least one aspect of convenience, 56% chose to use the internet because of its overall convenience; 19% because they can do it at a time that suits; 19% because it requires a shorter time; 6% because they don’t have to wait in a queue; 4% because the process was easy, uncomplicated or convenient and 4% because they did not have to wait for someone to send out information or forms.
- Of those people who mentioned at least one aspect of channel features, 7% chose to use the internet because they could control the information and did not need to rely on a service person; 5% because the information is consistent each time they visit the website; 4% because they do not need to make phone calls; 3% because they do not need to speak to a real person and 3% because they don’t have to go into a government office.
- Of those people who mentioned at least one aspect of availability, 7% chose to use the internet because it was the only option available or because they were told to do it that way.
Figure 56 Use of the telephone to contact government services
Figure 56 Use of the telephone to contact government services shows the changes in the use of the telephone to contact government from 28% of most recent contacts with government in 2004–05 and 2006, to 32% in 2007 and 30% in 2008.
Figure 57 Most common reasons for making contact by telephone
Figure 57 Most common reasons for making contact by telephone shows people’s main reasons for choosing to use the telephone in their most recent contact with government sorted by the themes of convenience, channel features, availability and cost. Issues of convenience and channel features were the main reasons people chose to use the telephone to contact government.
- Of those people who mentioned at least one aspect of convenience, 19% chose to use the telephone because they can do it at a time that suits; 14% because it requires a shorter time; 7% because it was easier; 6% because they do not have to wait in a queue and 6% because they did not have to go into a government office.
- Of those people who mentioned at least one aspect of channel features, 21% chose to use the telephone because of the speed or convenience of an automated system; 12% because they preferred to speak to a real person; 10% because they can ask and get answers immediately and do not have to wait and 10% because they can clarify or explain the issue to get the result they want.
- Of those people who mentioned at least one aspect of availability, 6% chose to use the telephone because they could not do it online or it was the only option available.
- Aspects of cost were mentioned by 9% who said telephone was a cheaper option.
Figure 58 In-person contact with government
Figure 58 In-person contact with government shows the decline in the use of in-person contact with government from 46% of most recent contacts with government in 2004–05, to 43% in 2006, 37% in 2007 and 34% in 2008.
Figure 59 Most common reasons for making contact in person
Figure 59 Most common reasons for making contact in person shows people’s main reasons for choosing to make contact in person in their most recent contact with government sorted by the themes of convenience, channel features and availability. Issues of convenience and availability were the main reasons people chose to contact government in person.
- Of those people who mentioned at least one aspect of availability, 16% chose to make contact in person because they was the only way the contact could be made; 15% because they had to do it this way or because they had to sign documents; and 3% because they were told to make the contact in person.
- Of those people who mentioned at least one aspect of convenience, 25% chose to make contact in person because of its overall convenience; 9% because they can do it at a time that suits; 7% because they were in the area or close to a government office; 4% because they had always made contact this way and 3% because they did not have to wait for someone to send out information or forms.
- Of those people who mentioned at least one aspect of channel features, 14% chose to make contact in person because they preferred to speak to a real person; 6% because it gave them an opportunity to clarify or explain to get the result they wanted and 5% because it provided an opportunity to ask questions and get answers immediately without having to wait for a reply.
Figure 60 Use of mail to contact government services
Figure 60 Use of mail to contact government services shows the decline in the use of mail to contact government from 13% of most recent contacts with government in 2004–05, to 10% in 2006 and 2007 and 9% in 2008.
Figure 61 Most common reasons for making contact by mail
Figure 61 Most common reasons for making contact by mail shows people’s main reasons for choosing to use mail in their most recent contact with government sorted by the themes of availability, convenience and channel features. Issues of availability and convenience were the main reasons people chose to use mail to contact government.
- Of those people who mentioned at least one aspect of availability, 27% chose to use mail because a form had been sent to them; 17% because there was no other way available and 12% because they had to sign a form. Eight per cent chose to use mail because they were unable to make contact online or because an online option was not available; 4% because they were replying by mail to something received by mail and 2% because they were told to make contact in this way.
- Of those who mentioned at least one aspect of convenience, 17% chose to use mail because of its overall convenience; 6% because they could do it at a time that suits; 5% because they had always made contact this way and 1% because it was generally easier.
- Of those who mentioned at least one aspect of channel features, 17% chose to use mail because they needed documentation or a record of the transaction; 2% because it did not require a computer; 2% because they get a better response from a letter or its more likely to be received by the correct person and acted upon; 2% because they do not have to wait in a queue and 1% because they do not have to go into a government office.
Figure 62 Those who can be encouraged to increase their use of the internet to contact government
Figure 62 Those who can be encouraged to increase their use of the internet to contact government shows the break-up of people who could be encouraged to increase their use of the internet to contact government and their current use of the internet.
This group comprises people who already use the internet and have previously contacted government by internet (40% of all people); people who already use the internet but have not used it to contact government (12% of all people); and people who are not current users of the internet (11% of all people).
Figure 63 Those who can NOT be encouraged to increase their use of the internet to contact government—by current internet use
Figure 63 Those who can NOT be encouraged to increase their use of the internet to contact government—by current internet use shows the break-up of people who could not be encouraged to increase their use of the internet to contact government and their current use of the internet.
This group comprises internet users who have previously contacted government by internet (21% of all people); people who already use the internet but have not used it to contact government (6% of all people); and people who are not current users of the internet (11% of all people).
Figure 64 Most common factors that would encourage increased use of the internet to contact government
Figure 64 Most common factors that would encourage increased use of the internet to contact government shows the most commonly reported factors in 2008 and 2007 which would encourage people to increase their use of the internet to contact government.
Website usability factors were mentioned by 22% in 2008 and 26% in 2007; website content by 10% and 12% in 2007; infrastructure by eight per cent in 2008 and 10% in 2007; better access by 7% in 2008 and 9% in 2007; increased awareness by 7% in 2008 and 8% in 2007; skills by 7% in 2008 and 9% in 2007; and cost by 5% in both 2007 and 2008.
Figure 65 Factors that would encourage increased use of the internet to contact government
Figure 65 Factors that would encourage increased use of the internet to contact government compares different factors which would encourage internet users and non-users to increase their use of the internet to contact government. For internet users, the most commonly reported factors which would encourage people to increase their use of the internet to contact government concern usability, better content and features, infrastructure and awareness. For non-internet users, the most commonly reported factors which would encourage people to increase their use of the internet to contact government concern access, skill and cost.
- Access was mentioned by 3% of internet users but 22% of non-internet users.
- Skill was mentioned by 4% of internet users but 15% of non-internet users.
- Cost mentioned by 5% of internet users but 8% of non-internet users.
- Security was mentioned by 4% of internet users and 1% of non-internet users.
- Awareness was mentioned by 9% of internet users but 3% of non-internet users.
- Infrastructure was mentioned by 10% of internet users but 2% of non-internet users.
- Better content and features was mentioned by 13% of internet users but 1% of non-internet users.
- Usability was mentioned by 28% of internet users but 3% of non-internet users.
- Thirty five per cent of internet users and 50% of non-internet users said that they were not interested in any factors which would increase their use of the internet to contact government.
Figure 66 Those who can be encouraged to increase their use of the internet to contact government
Figure 66 Those who can be encouraged to increase their use of the internet to contact government shows that 62% of people could be encouraged to increase their use of the internet to contact government and 38% could not be encouraged. This compares to 73% in 2007 who could be encouraged to increase their use of the internet to contact government and 27% who could not.
Figure 67 Those who can NOT be encouraged to increase their use of the internet to contact government—by proportion of internet contact with government
Figure 67 Those who can NOT be encouraged to increase their use of the internet to contact government—by proportion of internet contact with government shows the break-up of people who could not be encouraged to increase their use of the internet to contact government with how frequently they used the internet to contact government in the last twelve months.
- Of those who used the internet for all of their contact with government in the last twelve months, 43% could not be encouraged to increase their use.
- Of those who used the internet for most of their contact with government in the last twelve months, 36% could not be encouraged to increase their use.
- Of those who used the internet for some of their contact with government in the last twelve months, 29% could not be encouraged to increase their use.
- Of those who used the internet for a few of their contacts with government in the last twelve months, 33% could not be encouraged to increase their use.
- Of those who used the internet just once to contact government in the last twelve months, 38% could not be encouraged to increase their use.]
- Of those who used the internet for none of their contact with government in the last twelve months, 43% could not be encouraged to increase their use.
Figure 68 Preferred means of contacting government—what would encourage increased internet use
Figure 69 Preference between re-entering information and agency storing the details
Figure 69 Preference between re-entering information and agency storing the details shows the changes in people’s preferences between re-entering personal information and the agency storing that information for next time they visited that website in each year since 2004–05.
- In 2004–05, 50% of people preferred to re-enter personal information each time; 43% preferred the agency store the information and 7% refused or were unable to say.
- In 2006, 55% of people preferred to re-enter personal information each time; 38% preferred the agency store the information and 7% refused or were unable to say.
- In 2007, 52% of people preferred to re-enter personal information each time; 43% preferred the agency store the information and 6% refused or were unable to say.
- In 2008, 57% of people preferred to re-enter personal information each time; 38% preferred the agency store the information and 5% refused or were unable to say.
Figure 70 Preference between personalised services and anonymity
Figure 70 Preference between personalised services and anonymity shows the changes in people’s preferences between providing information which could be used to customise what they were able to see or do or remaining completely anonymous in each year since 2004–05.
- In 2004–05, 42% of people preferred to provide information for customisation of services; 50% preferred to remain completely anonymous and 9% refused or were unable to say.
- In 2006, 33% of people preferred to provide information for customisation of services; 59% preferred to remain completely anonymous and 8% refused or were unable to say.
- In 2007, 39% of people preferred to provide information for customisation of services; 54% preferred to remain completely anonymous and 7% refused or were unable to say.
- In 2008, 36% of people preferred to provide information for customisation of services; 57% preferred to remain completely anonymous and 7% refused or were unable to say.
Figure 71 Preference between telling government once and advising agencies separately
Figure 71 Preference between telling government once and advising agencies separately shows the changes in people’s preferences between telling the government just once when updating personal information such as a change of address or advising each agency separately in each year since 2004–05.
- In 2004–05, 64% of people preferred to tell government once; 33% preferred to advise each agency personally and 3% refused or were unable to say.
- In 2006, 72% of people preferred to tell government once; 25% preferred to advise each agency personally and 3% refused or were unable to say.
- In 2007, 73% of people preferred to tell government once; 25% preferred to advise each agency personally and 2% refused or were unable to say.
- In 2008, 68% of people preferred to tell government once; 29% preferred to advise each agency personally and 3% refused or were unable to say.
Figure 72 Preference for security over ease of use
Figure 72 Preference for security over ease of use shows the changes in people’s preferences between a higher level of security that adds time to transactions or a lower level of security that is faster and easier to complete in each year since 2004–05.
- In 2004–05, 77% of people preferred higher security with slower transactions; 16% preferred lower security with faster/easier transactions and 7% refused or were unable to say.
- In 2006, 82% of people preferred higher security with slower transactions; 13% preferred lower security with faster/easier transactions and 5% refused or were unable to say.
- In 2007, 84% of people preferred higher security with slower transactions; 13% preferred lower security with faster/easier transactions and 4% refused or were unable to say.
- In 2008, 85% of people preferred higher security with slower transactions; 11% preferred lower security with faster/easier transactions and 4% refused or were unable to say.
Figure 73 Most common reasons for not using the internet to contact government
Figure 73 Most common reasons for not using the internet to contact government shows the most frequently reported reasons for not using the internet to contact government in 2007 and 2008. The most frequently reported reasons in both years were that an online option was not available, the features offered by other channels and access.
- Of those who did not use the internet or website by mobile phone in their last contact with government, an online not being available was mentioned by 26% 2007 and 28% in 2008. Features of other channels were mentioned by 17% in 2007 and 2008; access by 12% in 2007 and 2008; infrastructure by 10% in 2007 and 9% in 2008; website usability by 9% in 2007 and 2008; convenience by 8% in 2007 and 2008; and awareness by 10% in 2007 and 7% in 2008.
- Security was mentioned as a reason for not using the internet by 4% in 2007 and 5% in 2008; website content by 3% in 2007 and 4% in 2008; and privacy by 4% in 2007 and 3% in 2008. Other reasons not specified above were mentioned by 12% in 2007 and 14% in 2008.
Figure 74 Most common reasons for not using the internet to contact government—time series and themes
Figure 74 Most common reasons for not using the internet to contact government—time series and themes shows the changes in the most frequently reported reasons for not using the internet in their most recent contact with government since 2004–05. These reasons fall under the categories of the features of other channels; availability; infrastructure; access; and awareness.
- Features of other channels were mentioned as a reason for not using the internet in their most recent contact with government by 11% in 2004–05, 14% in 2006 and 16% in 2007 and 2008 who preferred to speak to or meet a real person.
- Under the category of availability of online alternatives, an online option not being available was mentioned as a reason for not using the internet in their most recent contact with government by 13% in 2004–05, 8% in 2006, 13% in 2007 and 14% in 2008. The contact being only possible in person was mentioned by 11% in 2004–05, 17% in 2006, and 13% in 2007 and 2008.
- Under the category of infrastructure, the quality of websites and computer connections were mentioned as a reason for not using the internet in their most recent contact with government by 6% in 2004–05, 8% in 2006, 6% in 2007 and 9% in 2008.
- Under the category of access, not being familiar with using a computer or the internet in general was mentioned as a reason for not using the internet in their most recent contact with government by 6% in 2004–05, 8% in 2006, 6% in 2007 and 7% in 2008.
- Under the category of awareness, not being aware that the contact could be made online was mentioned as a reason for not using the internet in their most recent contact with government by 9% in 2004–05, 8% in 2006, 9% in 2007 and 7% in 2008.
Figure 75 Most common reasons why attempts to find government information or services online were unsuccessful
Figure 75 Most common reasons why attempts to find government information or services online were unsuccessful shows the most frequently reported reasons why people who tried to use the internet to contact government in the last twelve months had been unsuccessful in their attempt. These reasons fall under the categories of content not being available, website usability and discoverability of content.
- Forty three per cent reported that the content or information they wanted was not available.
- Website usability was mentioned by 28% who said the website was too hard to use or understand; 10% who said they found the website, but the search function did not work, 2% who said the website was too slow and 2% who had issues with passwords or logging in.
- Discoverability of content was mentioned by 11% who did not know where to go to find the website; 7% who did not know which department/agency or service to contact; and 3% who said there were too many websites to choose from.
Figure 76 Most common reasons why internet users contacted government in person rather than by telephone
Figure 76 Most common reasons why internet users contacted government in person rather than by telephone shows the most frequently reported reasons why internet users made their last contact with government in person rather than by telephone.
- Forty three per cent reported a telephone option was not available; 13% mentioned telephone usability; 12% convenience; 11% a process requirement; 4% preferred personal contact and 4% mentioned availability as reasons for making contact in person rather than by telephone.
Figure 77 Most common reasons why internet users contacted government in person rather than by internet or telephone—individual reasons by category
Figure 77 Most common reasons why internet users contacted government in person rather than by internet or telephone—individual reasons by category shows the break-up of the most frequently reported reasons why internet users made their last contact with government in person rather than by telephone. These reasons fall under the categories of ability, process requirement, availability, convenience and usability.
- Thirty-seven per cent reported that the contact was only possible in person.
- A process requirement was mentioned by 7% who said they needed to sign documents or forms and 5% who said the process was too difficult for the phone.
- Availability was mentioned by 8% who said that a telephone option was not available or that it was not possible to make the contact by phone.
- Convenience was also mentioned by 8% who said that a government office was close by or that it was easier to do over the counter.
- Usability was mentioned by 5% who had difficulty with or disliked automated telephone systems.
Figure 78 Most common reasons for using the internet to contact government instead of the telephone
Figure 78 Most common reasons for using the internet to contact government instead of the telephone shows the most frequently reported reasons why people used the internet rather than the telephone for their last contact with government.
- Sixty four per cent reported convenience as a reason; 35% mentioned features of the internet; 6% cost; 2% awareness of a phone option; 2% availability; and 8% mentioned other reasons for making contact by internet rather than by telephone.
Figure 79 Most common reasons for using the internet to contact government instead of the telephone 2007–2008
Figure 79 Most common reasons for using the internet to contact government instead of the telephone 2007–2008 shows the most frequently reported reasons for using the internet rather than the telephone to contact government in 2007 and 2008. The most frequently reported reasons in both years were that they could do it at a time that suits them, the online option requires a shorter time and they do not have to wait in a queue.
- Of those who used the internet in their last contact with government, being able to do it at a time that suits was mentioned by 36% in 2007 and 28% in 2008. An online option requiring a shorter time was mentioned by 33% in 2007 and 25% in 2008; not having to wait in a queue by 14% in 2007 and 2008; not needing to make a phone call by 9% in 2007 and 10% in 2008; the ability to control what and how much information they want by 8% in 2007 and 10% in 2008; and the consistency of information each time they visit a website by 4% in 2007 and 6% in 2008.
- The lower cost was mentioned as a reason for using the internet by 5% in 2007 and 6% in 2008; and that it was simpler or easier to make contact by internet by 4% in 2007 and 5% in 2008.
Figure 80 Preferred method of contacting government
Figure 80 Preferred method of contacting government shows the changes in people’s preferences for contacting government since 2004–05, and the growth in preference for the internet. It shows that this growth is mainly at the expense of contact in person.
- The internet was the preferred method of contact with government for 31% of people in 2004–05, 33% in 2006, 41% in 2007 and 44% in 2008.
- The telephone was the preferred method of contact with government for 28% of people in 2004–05, 35% in 2006, 33% in 2007 and 34% in 2008.
- Contact in person was the preferred method of contact with government for 33% of people in 2004–05, 25% in 2006, 20% in 2007 and 16% in 2008.
- Mail was the preferred method of contact with government for 6% of people in 2004–05, 3% in 2006 and 2007 and 2% in 2008.
Figure 81 Internet—preferred use compared with actual use
Figure 81 Internet—preferred use compared with actual use shows the difference between people’s preference for using the internet to contact government and the actual use of the internet in their last contact with government since 2004–05. A gap between preference and actual use still exists, but has declined.
- In 2004–05, 31% of people preferred to use the internet to contact government but 19% had actually used the internet in their last contact.
- In 2006, 33% of people preferred to use the internet to contact government but 25% had actually used the internet in their last contact.
- In 2007, 41% of people preferred to use the internet to contact government, but 29% had actually used the internet in their last contact.
- In 2008, 44% of people preferred to use the internet to contact government, but 38% had actually used the internet in their last contact.
Figure 82 Telephone—preferred use compared with actual use
Figure 82 Telephone—preferred use compared with actual use shows the difference between people’s preference for using the telephone to contact government and the actual use of the telephone in their last contact with government since 2004–05.
- In 2004–05, 28% of people preferred to use the telephone to contact government and 28% had actually used the telephone in their last contact.
- In 2006, 35% of people preferred to use the telephone to contact government and 28% had actually used the telephone in their last contact.
- In 2007, 33% of people preferred to use the telephone to contact government, and 32% had actually used the telephone in their last contact.
- In 2008, 34% of people preferred to use the telephone to contact government, and 30% had actually used the telephone in their last contact.
Figure 83 In-person contact—preferred use compared with actual use
Figure 83 In-person contact—preferred use compared with actual use shows the difference between people’s preference for contact with government in person and the actual use of in-person contact in their last contact with government since 2004–05. It shows that both preference and use of contact in person is declining.
- In 2004–05, 33% of people preferred to contact government in person and 46% had actually used in-person contact in their last contact.
- In 2006, 25% of people preferred to contact government in person, and 43% had actually used in-person contact in their last contact.
- In 2007, 20% of people preferred to contact government in person, and 37% had actually used in-person contact in their last contact.
- In 2008, 16% of people preferred to contact government in person, and 34% had actually used in-person contact in their last contact.
Figure 84 Preferred way of contacting government compared with method actually used
Figure 84 Preferred way of contacting government compared with method actually used shows the differences between people’s preferred method of contacting government and the method actually used in their last contact. People who made contact using the internet or telephone are most likely to have used their preferred method of contact. People using mail are least likely to have used their preferred method of contact.
- Of those who used the internet for their last contact with government, 74% did prefer to use the internet; 17% would have preferred to use the telephone; 5% would have preferred contact in person and 1% would have preferred mail.
- Of those who used the telephone for their last contact with government, 25% would have preferred to use the internet; 59% did prefer to use the telephone; 10% would have preferred contact in person and 2% would have preferred mail.
- Of those who made their last contact with government in person, 28% preferred would have to use the internet; 31% would have preferred to use the telephone; 35% did prefer contact in person and 2% would have preferred mail.
- Of those who used mail for their last contact with government, 39% would have preferred to use the internet; 35% would have preferred to use the telephone; 10% would have preferred contact in person and 9% did prefer mail.
Figure 85 Preferred service delivery channel and broadband connection
Figure 85 Preferred service delivery channel and broadband connection shows the differences in people’s preferred method of contacting government depending whether they have a broadband connection. It shows that people with a broadband connection are more likely to prefer to make contact with government by internet. Those without a broadband connection are most likely to prefer to make contact with government by telephone.
- Of those with a broadband connection, 56% prefer to contact government by internet compared to 19% of those without broadband; 28% with a broadband connection prefer contact by telephone compared with 45% of those without broadband; 12% with a broadband connection prefer contact in person compared with 28% of those without broadband and 2% with a broadband connection prefer contact by mail compared to 4% of those without broadband.
Figure 86 Preferred service delivery channel by age
Figure 86 Preferred service delivery channel by age shows the differences in people’s preferred method of contacting government depending on age. The internet is the preferred method of contact for all age groups under 55; the telephone is the preferred method of contact over 55 and contact in-person is the second most preferred method of contact for people over 65.
- Internet is the preferred method of contact for 58% of people aged 18-24; 61% aged 25-34; 52% aged 35-44; 43% aged 45-54; 39% aged 55-64 and for 14% of those aged over 65.
- Telephone is the preferred method of contact for 22% of people aged 18-24; 26% aged 25-34; 32% aged 35-44; 34% aged 45-54; 37% aged 55-64 and for 50% of those aged over 65.
- Contact in person is the preferred method for 14% of people aged 18-24; 10% aged 25-34; 11% aged 35-44; 17% aged 45-54; 19% aged 55-64 and for 28% of those aged over 65.
- Mail is the preferred method of contact for 3% of people aged 18-24; 1% aged 25-34; 2% for those aged between 35-64 and for 5% of those aged over 65.
Previous Section: Appendix 3—Statistical Reliability | Table of Contents
Contact for information on this page: Measurement.project@finance.gov.au
