finance.gov.au

Contact and help

Example Australian Government RISs

In preparing a Regulation Impact Statement (RIS), officials often find it helpful to examine examples of RISs which have been assessed as adequate. The following examples have been published on this website for that purpose. They have been chosen to illustrate RISs for different types of regulatory proposals as well as different degrees of analysis. It should be noted that the amount of detail and depth of analysis in the RISs need to be commensurate with the magnitude of the problem and with the size of the potential impact of the proposals.

RISs prepared for the Australian Government are usually tabled in Parliament or otherwise made public. If tabled in Parliament they form part of the Explanatory Memorandum which is published for each Bill tabled in Parliament, and part of the Explanatory Statement for each legislative instrument tabled. Once tabled, many RISs may be accessed on the Australian Government's Commonwealth Law website [External Site] (ComLaw) which incorporates the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

Examples of Australian Government RISs

Bass Strait Central Zone Scallop Fishery Management Plan 2002

Bass Strait Central Zone Scallop Fishery Management Plan 2002 PDF version [PDF Document - 128 KB]
Bass Strait Central Zone Scallop Fishery Management Plan 2002 RTF version [Word Document - 652 KB]

Disability Standards for Education 2005

This Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) has been prepared by the Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training, in association with the Commonwealth Attorney-General's Department. Its purpose is to assist the Australian Government to make decisions regarding the provision of education and training that does not discriminate against people with disabilities on the ground of their disability. To achieve this, the RIS assesses the impact of legislating Disability Standards for Education (Standards) under the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA).

The RIS identifies community concerns in relation to the participation of students with disabilities in education and training and the need for the elimination of discrimination on the ground of disability. Eliminating discrimination on the ground of disability, as far as possible, and ensuring, as far as practicable, that people with disabilities have the same rights to equality before the law in the area of education and training as the rest of the community are generally the objects of the DDA. The RIS considers a range of possible options for addressing these concerns. Primary among these are Disability Standards for Education.

The RIS concludes that Disability Standards for Education are the most appropriate option to support more effective achievement of the objects of the DDA. This strategy is consistent with the policy direction set by the then Attorney-General who, in 1995, requested the then Minister for Education, Employment and Training to assist with the production of disability standards in relation to the education of people with disabilities.

Furthermore, in December 2002 the unanimous report of the Senate Employment, Workplace Relations and Education References Committee Inquiry into Education of Students with Disabilities recognised that the Standards are necessary to address the discriminatory practices it had identified.

The draft report on the Productivity Commission Review of the DDA (2003) also strongly supports the development of disability standards, and recommends that the DDA be amended to allow for standards development in "any area in which it is unlawful to discriminate on the ground of disability". The review report supports the DDA as the appropriate approach to providing enforceable rights to people with disabilities, and finds that the DDA has been more effective in the area of education than in any other area covered by the DDA. It also finds that disability standards tend to promote a uniform playing field and the Disability Standards for Education seek to address gaps in the DDA's provisions, in particular, through the extension of the unjustifiable hardship provision.

The RIS discusses the implications for various stakeholders of implementing the Standards, including potential costs and benefits arising from the Standards. The primary impact the RIS identifies is the greater clarity and certainty that the Standards would give providers in meeting their obligations under the DDA.

Complete Document

Disability Standards for Education 2005 PDF version [PDF Document - 128 KB]

Contents

Contents

Part 1   Background

Part 2   The problem or issue that first gives rise to the need for action
2.1   Objects of the DDA
2.2   Need to clarify provisions of the DDA

Part 3   The desired objectives
3.1   Clarification of rights and obligations
3.2   Enhancing the implementation of the objects of the DDA

Part 4   The options that may constitute viable means for achieving the desired objective
4.1   Consideration of the Options
4.2   Preliminary Conclusion
4.3   Development of the Disability Standards for Education

Part 5   Impact Analysis of the Implementation of Education Standards
5.1   Implications for students
5.2   Implications for providers

Part 6   Consultation
6.1   The 1997 Consultation Process
6.2   The 2000 Consultation Process

Part 7   Potential costs and benefits
7.1   2002 Costing Exercise
7.2   Independent cost-benefit analysis of the Standards (2003)
7.3   Findings of the 2003 Productivity Commission Review of the DDA

Part 8   Conclusion

Part 9   Strategy for implementation
9.1   Review of the Standards

Appendix A   Complaints to HREOC

Fisheries Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 1999

Fisheries Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 1999 PDF version [PDF Document - 99 KB]
Fisheries Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 1999 RTF version [Word Document - 300 KB]

Fuel Quality Standards Bill 2000

Fuel Quality Standards Bill 2000 PDF version [PDF Document - 210 KB]
Fuel Quality Standards Bill 2000 RTF version [Word Document - 183 KB]

Fuel Standard (Petrol) Determination 2001 / Fuel Standard (Diesel) Determination 2001

Fuel Standard (Petrol) Determination 2001 / Fuel Standard (Diesel) Determination 2001 PDF version [PDF Document - 183 KB]
Fuel Standard (Petrol) Determination 2001 / Fuel Standard (Diesel) Determination 2001 RTF version [Word Document - 225 KB]

Solitary Islands Marine Reserve (Commonwealth Waters) Management Plan

Solitary Islands Marine Reserve (Commonwealth Waters) Management Plan PDF version [PDF Document - 177 KB]
Solitary Islands Marine Reserve (Commonwealth Waters) Management Plan RTF version [Word Document - 1.25 MB]


Contact for information on this page: OBPR contacts page


Back to top

Last Modified: 13 June, 2008