4 Performance Reference Model
4.9 Demonstrating the Outcome Process Model
4.9.1 Example 1: OPM used in activity planning
Operation of the Outcome Process Model (OPM) in reverse provides a powerful outcome-focused business planning framework capable of supporting strategic and tactical business planning, project planning, workforce planning, business case development and investment management.

Figure 4-35: The OPM and business planning
| OPM | Business Planning task |
|---|---|
| Step 1 Define the outcome(s) sought |
Desired outcomes are defined at the beginning of any tactical or strategic planning exercise. They take the form of a statement of the objectives that are sought to be realised through a planned body of work and can be social, economic or environmental. |
| Step 2 Identify the necessary effects |
Once an understanding of the outcome is reached, it is possible to identify the group of effects that need to be realised and in what timeframes, in order for the outcome to be deemed to be secured. |
| Steps 3 and 4 Specify the outputs and determine the levels of usage needed |
Following the identification of effects necessary to secure the outcome, it is possible to determine any outputs and the levels of usage required to generate the effects we are seeking to realise. Note that 'usage' is the OPM term that encapsulates, for example:
|
| Step 5 Determine the work to be completed |
Once a government agency knows what types and volumes of outputs it must create, it is able to determine the work (business processes and activities) and rate of production required to produce them. |
| Step 6 Specify the inputs required |
By knowing what types of outputs must be produced and the work processes that are required to produce them, agencies are able to determine the volume and mix of inputs that are required to sustain work processes and output production levels. |
4.9.2 Example 2: OPM used in operations management
The following scenarios demonstrate the concepts of the OPM in the management (execution) context of various government organisations:
- the construction of a new roadway (infrastructure)
- the development of new legislation (policing)
- the delivery of a public awareness campaign (health)
- the execution of a military campaign (defence).
Note that these examples are provided to illustrate the operational concepts of this model and are simplified versions of very complex scenarios.

Figure 4-36: OPM and business operations
| OPM | Business Operation task |
|---|---|
| Inputs | The necessary composition and quantity of resources are allocated to an initiative in accordance with endorsed plans, and provided as inputs to the processes and activities (work) that will be executed by the organisation:
|
| Work | Work consumes physical and technological labour by applying it to the execution of business processes and activities that convert the input resources into the specified outputs. The sustained effort necessitated by the provision of a service for the public is also considered to be work:
|
| Outputs | Produced outputs are consistent with the definitions of the business processes that were executed in order to create them. The outputs of work could include:
|
| Usage | The outputs that have been produced do not in themselves realise an outcome unless the output of an activity was the removal of an obstruction to what would otherwise be normal 'state of the world'. Outputs must be utilised in order to create an effect or realise an outcome. Usage includes activities such as:
|
| Effects | The usage of outputs causes effects that are observable and measurable:
|
| Outcomes | The outcome realised by the program can be inferred through the observed and measured effect. Based upon the examples provided above, it could be argued that:
|
Contact for information on this page: AGA@finance.gov.au
